Krisztina Horváth
Factors Influencing Deaf Children’s Language Acquisition
Deaf children’s language acquisition is
influenced by various factors. According to the listed sources, three factors
play a very important part in language acquisition: environment, linguistic
input and the degree of hearing loss. Concerning
environment, school and family in particular have a great influence on language
learning. If a deaf child is born into a hearing family, language acquisition
is more difficult. Linguistic input also plays an important part and it is
important whether it is given in sign language or a spoken language. The degree
of hearing loss also plays an important part in language learning; every case
is different and poses different levels of difficulty concerning language
acquisition. The most important question for the research is: how do these
three factors influence deaf children’s language acquisition?
Hattyár, H. (2008.) A
magyarországi siketek nyelvelsajátításának és nyelvhasználatának
szociolingvisztikai vizsgálata. [The Sociolinguistic Research of Hungarian Deaf
People’s Language Acquisition and Language Use] Unpublished doctoral
dissertation, Nyelvtudományi Doktori Iskola, Magyar Nyelvtudományi Doktori
Program, Budapest. http://doktori.btk.elte.hu/lingv/hattyar/diss_nem.pdf
Hattyár’s
doctoral dissertation covers several topics concerning deaf children’s language
acquisition and language use from a sociolinguistic point of view. She argues
that linguistic input, family background and education are all important
influencing factors in deaf children’s language acquisition. However, the best
method for language acquisition can only be determined in light of whether the
child has pre- or post-lingual deafness.
I found
Hattyár’s dissertation a valuable source for my research as it covers many
aspect of deaf children’s language acquisition. One aspect in particular is
very interesting, namely that the ‘type’ of deafness plays an important part in
children’s language learning process. If children have pre-lingual deafness
that means that they became deaf before receiving any linguistic input, thus
having no access to linguistic structures that could help their language
development later. Post-lingual deafness means that children have received
linguistic input and already acquired some linguistic structures that could
help them with language learning. In both cases there are various methods to
help language acquisition, but it is clear that the most useful mode of
instruction is the one in sign language. At the early stages, the choice is in
the hands of the parents, that is why family background is also an important
influencing factor.
Schick, B., De Villiers, P.,
De Villiers, J., & Hoffmeister, R. (2007). Language And Theory Of Mind: A
Study Of Deaf Children. Child Development, 78(2), 376-396.
Retrieved March 25, 2015, from Jstor.
This study examined deaf
children’s linguistic and cognitive development with the aid of various tasks
(e.g., appearance reality task). They measured the children’s nonverbal
intelligence, false-belief reasoning and language. 176 children participated in
the study from age four to eight year olds from various family backgrounds;
deaf children with hearing parents who received oral linguistic input (oral
DoH), deaf children with hearing parents who received sign language input (ASL
DoH), deaf children with deaf parents (ASL DoD) who learned sign language and
also hearing children were involved to provide a control group. The children
were given various tasks that were conducted with carefully selected examiners.
The study showed that although deaf children have normal social and emotional
skills, their language skills are most often delayed compared to hearing
children because they do not have or only have limited access to language,
either spoken or signed.
I found the study important
for my research because it provides evidence that deaf children’s language
acquisition is indeed influenced by family background and linguistic input. The
study shows that language delay and language deficits are more prevalent among
deaf children with hearing parents who are provided with oral linguistic input
in most cases. Even if hearing parents provide sign language input, it is
usually restricted, parents’ vocabulary is limited, and therefore, they only
provide conversation topics on a rudimentary level. In such scenarios, deaf
children have no or very limited access to conversation or speakers;
consequently, they have limited access to complex structures, thus they are
delayed in their reasoning about cognitive states as well. However, deaf
children with deaf parents (DoD) who are given proper sign language input
develop linguistic and cognitive skills just as well as hearing children born
to hearing families. The study argues that proper linguistic input is vital for
deaf children to acquire language properly.
Meyer, R. (1991). Language
Acquisition by Deaf Children. American Scientists, 79(1), 60-70.
Retrieved March 25, 2015, from Jstor.
Meyer argues that every child
has an innate capacity to acquire languages and says that language acquisition
itself is independent of modality. This means that sign languages could be
acquired just as easily as a spoken languages in general. Consequently,
children pass roughly the same milestones in language acquisition in both the
cases of sign and spoken languages. Language acquisition is also controlled by
maturation; therefore, it is important that children are exposed to linguistic
stimuli during a critical period, from 2 to 13 years of age, otherwise they
will have problems with language learning.
The article is important for
my research because it provides information on deaf children’s language
acquisition and stresses the importance of proper linguistic input. Meyer
argues that deaf children from hearing families are in a difficult situation,
as they have restricted language stimuli. According to the critical period
theory, the sooner they acquire a language, the more native-like proficiency
they will reach. However, many deaf children from hearing families encounter
sign languages in schools or dormitories for the first time around the age of
seven; or only after finishing their studies, around the age of 20, if the
school uses a strictly oralist method that excludes sign language. Their
language competence will be very different compared to those deaf children who
had access to sign language from early childhood. Meyer demonstrates that
delayed linguistic exposure has significant effect on knowledge of morphology
but less on word order. Late learners can still acquire a large sign vocabulary
but they will never be able to produce utterances with the same syntax as their
peers who have been exposed to sign language since infancy.
No comments:
Post a Comment